Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Donte Parrish v. Steven Rowe, et al
as 13-2452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONTE PARRISH
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN ROWE, U.S. Marshall, SIX OTHER AGENTS FORM VARIOUS AGENCIES, SGT. DAVID GODFREY, York City and others
Goods v. Stine et al
as 2:2013cv00019
Plaintiff:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Defendant:
Fred A. Stine, V, Steven R. Jaeger, Joseph Meadows and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Parrish v. Rowe et al
as 1:2013cv00260
Plaintiff:
Donte Parrish
Defendant:
Steven Rowe, Six other agents from various agencies, David Godfrey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011at01141
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02124
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Glass v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2011cv00211
Defendant:
Bel Fury Investment Group, LLC, William Binkard, Wayne Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
Leourieta B. Glass
MALDEF:
Mexico American Legal Defense & Educational Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mendez v. City of Shenandoah et al
as 3:2011cv01086
Plaintiff:
Ruben Mendez
Defendant:
City of Shenandoah, Shawn Tray, Jamie Gennarini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
