Cases 31 - 40 of 22,946
Hatter v. DART et al
as 1:2024cv04735
Plaintiff:
Daneka Hatter
Defendant:
THOMAS DART, Supt. Cintron, Sgt. Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BRYCELAND v. GUT
as 2:2024cv06863
Plaintiff:
MARTA BRYCELAND
Defendant:
THOMAS GUT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kisliuk v. City of Fort Bragg et al
as 1:2024cv03440
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jackson Kisliuk
Defendant:
City of Fort Bragg, Mendocino County Sheriff's Office, Thomas O'Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Sewell v. Maddox et al
as 2:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Amy Giles Sewell
Defendant:
Thomas N Maddox, City of Elba, Alabama and Harold L. Staley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Thomas Jacobi Allen v. US
as 24-1519
Plaintiff:
THOMAS C. JACOBI ALLEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Richards v. X. Corp
as 5:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Thomas Richards
Defendant:
X. Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
A. Philip Randolph Institute v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 24-1512
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE and ACTION NC
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, DAMON CIRCOSTA, in his official capacity as CHAIR OF THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, STELLA ANDERSON, in her official capacity as SECRETARY OF THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
