Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Marosi v. Rushing et al
as 5:2013cv05198
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Marosi
Defendant:
Conrad Rushing, Eugene M Premo, Nathan D. Mihara and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Craven
as 1:2013cv02568
Plaintiff:
Catherine V. Smith
Defendant:
Earl Randy Craven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Daley v. United States Attorney Delawar, et al
as 13-3456
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN R. DALEY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY DELAWARE, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv00758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pickering-George v. United States Attorneys Office et al
as 1:2013cv00126
Plaintiff:
John Pickering-George
Defendant:
United States Attorneys Office, Department of Justice, National Archives and Records Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David McDonald v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 12-5023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David McDonald
Defendant - Appellee:
Kenneth Lee Salazar, Secretary, United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Diana V. Smith and others
MORGAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2010cv03090
Plaintiff:
RENY MORGAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THEO V. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCDONALD v. KEMPTHORNE et al
as 1:2008cv01696
Plaintiff:
DAVID MCDONALD
Defendant:
DIRK KEMPTHORNE, DIANA V. SMITH, PHILIP J. BECK and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
