Cases 41 - 50 of 74
OWENS et al v. Thomas
as 3:2012cv00018
Plaintiff:
JAMES H OWENS and DOUBLE O BONDING COMPANY INC
Defendant:
Kip C Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2011cv09275
Plaintiff:
Courtney Thomas and Jeffrey Nichols
Defendant:
City of Chicago, City Of Chicago Police Department, C. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Flowers v. Demery et al
as 5:2011cv00315
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Flowers
Defendant:
Mickal Demery, Johnson, Rukker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortega v. City and County of Denver, The et al
as 1:2011cv02394
Plaintiff:
Ana Alicia Ortega
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, The , Ricky (I) Nixon , Ricky Nixon and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Kelly Boren , Kristal Carrillo and Sharelle C. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. City and County of Denver, The et al
as 1:2011cv02397
Plaintiff:
Sharelle C. Thomas
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, The , Ricky (I) Nixon , Ricky Nixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giorgis v. Goodman et al
as 2:2011cv01767
Plaintiff:
Araya Wolde Giorgis
Defendant:
Christopher M Goodman , Geoffrey S Kercsmar , Todd Feltus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ammari et al v. State of California et al
as 1:2011cv00867
Plaintiff:
Naiel Ammari and Turlock RV Center, Inc.
Defendant:
State of California, Eugene Brathwaite and Sylvia C. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
