Cases 41 - 50 of 369
Shannon Clark v. Garfield Beach CVS, LLC, et al
as 22-55590
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANNON CLARK
Defendant / Appellee:
GARFIELD BEACH CVS, LLC, Erroneously Sued As CVS Pharmacy Inc. and KAREN S. LYNCH, CVS Pharmacy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00337
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv05847
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Shannon Clark v. CVS Pharmacy Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv09248
Plaintiff:
Shannon Clark
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy Inc., Karen S. Lynch and Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
THOMPSON v. CVS PHARMACY INC
as 4:2021cv00472
Plaintiff:
Larson Thompson
Defendant:
CVS PHARMACY INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
O'Neal v. MacDill AFB et al
as 8:2021cv02576
Plaintiff:
Tarjal LaTrois O'Neal
Defendant:
MacDill AFB, Fort Jackson Army Instillation, Department of Economic Opportunity and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
