Cases 41 - 50 of 581
Smith v. City of Montgomery, Alabama (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Alabama, Steven Reed, Darryl Albert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moccia v. Town of Bay Harbor Islands et al
as 1:2023cv20006
Plaintiff:
Luigi Moccia
Defendant:
Town of Bay Harbor Islands, John Grimes, Ray Watler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Grimes v. United States Olympic Committee, et al
as 22-1429
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME L. GRIMES
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OLYMPIC COMMITTEE, USA BOXING, INC. and ERNIE "SUNNY" MARSON, SR.
GRIMES v. PNC BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2022cv01758
Plaintiff:
JEROME L. GRIMES
Defendant:
PNC BANK, N.A. and HEIDI TAAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grimes v. (LU) Liberty University et al
as 6:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Grimes
Defendant:
(LU) Liberty University, Board of Trustees of (LU) Liberty University, (LU) Liberty University IT Department and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 - Title IX of the Education Amendment of 1972
GRIMES v. PNC BANK
as 2:2022cv01547
Plaintiff:
JEROME L. GRIMES
Defendant:
PNC BANK and J. SALZMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grimes v. Douglas County Municipal
as 22-1316
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME L. GRIMES
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUGLAS COUNTY MUNICIPAL
Grimes v. PNC Bank
as 3:2022cv01387
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Grimes
Defendant:
PNC Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 au Diversity-Auto Negligence
Grimes v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Denver
as 22-1283
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME L. GRIMES
Defendant / Appellee:
ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR COMPANY OF DENVER, LLC
Grimes v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Denver, LLC
as 1:2022cv02345
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Grimes
Defendant:
Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Denver, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
