Cases 41 - 50 of 982
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Benford v. Dowd et al
as 4:2023cv00998
Plaintiff:
Jessie Samuel Rufus Benford
Defendant:
James M. Dowd, Robin Ransom and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Benford v. Stimson
as 4:2023cv00999
Plaintiff:
Jessie Samuel Rufus Benford
Defendant:
S. Stimson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Epi's Canoe & Kayak Team, LLC et al v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2023cv00836
Defendant:
Texas Military Department, STATE OF TEXAS, Governor of Texas Greg Abbott and others
Plaintiff:
Epi's Canoe & Kayak Team, LLC and Jessie F. Fuentes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Walker v. Ragazino et al
as 1:2023cv02827
Plaintiff:
Toni P. Walker and Anthony Walker, Sr.
Defendant:
James Eric Ragazino, Delquis R. Mendoza, Beverly Dwyer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Owens v. Kijakazi et al
as 1:2023cv01623
Plaintiff:
Mildred Deloris Owens
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Mark Warshawsky, Stephen Evangelista and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
David Jones, et al v. Myvette Goldburn, et al
as 23-55537
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID DARYL JONES and JESSIE JOSHUA JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
MYVETTE GOLDBURN, Deputy and DOES, 1-15
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
