Cases 41 - 50 of 1,588
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Campbell v. Taveras et al
as 1:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Campbell
Defendant:
Leydi Taveras, Ms. Kesha Townsel, Mr. Waliek Crandal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Van Oliver v. State Of Ohio et al
as 2:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Eddie Van Oliver, III
Defendant:
State Of Ohio, Lawerence Hairston and Eddie Van Oliver, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Cases
Marker v. Oliver et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Larry Marker
Defendant:
Maggie Toulouse Oliver and Raul Torrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
v. OLIVER
as 5:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J OLIVER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2024cv10080
Plaintiff:
Sabrina M Williams and Pro se litigant Sabrina M Williams
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Judge Theresa Bisenius, Judge Jennifer Ulwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
