Cases 41 - 50 of 89
COPE, et al v. KS State Board of Education, et al
as 14-3280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COPE, AKA Citizens for Objective Public Education, CARL REIMER, MARY ANGELA REIMER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KANSAS STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, JANET WAUGH, Member of the Kansas State Board of Education, in her official capacity only, STEVE ROBERTS, Member of the Kansas State Board of Education, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv03942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Fernandez et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 2:2014cv14397
Plaintiff:
Diana Fernandez , Terri Jackson , Priscilla Ostapiej and others
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00766
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Prather v. Osage County Bureau of Indian Affairs Agency et al
as 4:2014cv00079
Plaintiff:
John Prather
Defendant:
Osage County Bureau of Indian Affairs Agency, Robin M Phillips, Larraine Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. McHenry County et al
as 3:2014cv50003
Plaintiff:
Robert A Johnson
Defendant:
McHenry County, City of Crystal Lake, Joshua Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
