Cases 41 - 50 of 4,862
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Briggs, et al v. Scanlan
as 24-1316
Plaintiff:
LYNN-DIANE BRIGGS, WAYNE P. SAYA, SR. and KAREN TESTERMAN
Defendant:
DAVID SCANLAN, Secretary of State, NH and CHRIS AGER, Chairman, NH Republican State Committee
Interested Party:
NORMAN J. SILBER
Jamil v. Vermont Judiciary & Judicial Administration et al
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Taifoor Jamil
Defendant:
State of Vermont Judiciary & Judicial Administration, T.J. Donovan, William Sorrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Kanautica Zayre-Brown v. North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections
as 24-6477
Plaintiff:
KANAUTICA ZAYRE-BROWN
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS, TODD E. ISHEE, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Adult Correction, GARY JUNKER, in his official capacity as Deputy Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Adult Correction and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
