Cases 41 - 50 of 186
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv02354
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Citadel, The et al
as 2:2020cv00758
Defendant:
Citadel, The, Eugene F Paluso, The Military College of the State of South Carolina and others
Plaintiff:
Waylon Bruce Jackson, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
COFFEY v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
as 1:2020cv00006
Defendant:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Plaintiff:
L.E. PAULI COFFEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
303 Creative, et al v. Elenis, et al
as 19-1413
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY ARAGON, HEIDI HESS, MIGUEL RENE ELIAS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORIE SMITH and 303 CREATIVE LLC, a limited liability company
Petitioner:
FOUNDATION FOR MORAL LAW
Amicus Curiae:
CATO INSTITUTE, CENTER FOR RELIGIOUS EXPRESSION, CATHOLICVOTE.ORG EDUCATION FUND and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02357
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COFFEY v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
as 1:2019cv03064
Defendant:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Plaintiff:
L.E. PAULI COFFEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sallis v. State of South Carolina Child Support Division
as 7:2019cv00320
Plaintiff:
Derrick Sallis
Defendant:
State of South Carolina Child Support Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv00198
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Brady v. Myrtle Beach, City of et al
as 4:2019cv00107
Defendant:
Myrtle Beach, City of, State of South Carolina, Metro Properties Group LLC and others
Plaintiff:
James Brady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv12448
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
