Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Romious v. Nixon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00013
Plaintiff: Carlos Romious, Sr.
Defendant: Jeremiah W. Nixon, Chris Koster, James Ronald Carrier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv06646
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
David Jeep v. Barack Obama, President, et al
as 11-2425
Plaintiff - Appellant: David Gerard Jeep
Defendant - Appellee: Barack Hussein Obama, President, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and others
Jeep v. Obama et al
as 4:2011cv00931
Plaintiff: David G. Jeep
Defendant: Barack Hussein Obama, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv00436
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03659
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Tugle v. Stith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00849
Plaintiff: Shannon Tugle
Defendant: Antwan Stith and Village of Washington Park, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1185
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00743
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lane et al v. City Of Houston
as 4:2009cv03541
Plaintiff: Jeremy O. Lane and David A. Stith
Defendant: City Of Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?