Cases 41 - 50 of 132
Stovall v. Agency Health Care Family Services Division of Child Support Division/Appeals and Offset Unit et al
as 3:2017cv50254
Plaintiff:
Kurt Douglas Stovall
Defendant:
Agency Health Care Family Services Division of Child Support Division/Appeals and Offset Unit, Felicia F. Norwood, Lauren E. Volanti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02412
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stovall v. McCarty et al
as 1:2017cv04762
Plaintiff:
Grace L Stovall
Defendant:
Amy McCarty, Ingrid Brown, Jamie Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STOVALL v. GRAZIOLI et al
as 1:2016cv04839
Plaintiff:
FLAVIA STOVALL
Defendant:
JAMES GRAZIOLI , LOUIS NARVAEZ , GILBERTO VELASQUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kurt Stovall v. Daniel Grohen, et al
as 16-2245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KURT D. STOVALL
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL GROHEN, SONIA WILLEY and MARY B. SCHOLTEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00632
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stovall v. City of Chicago Department of Police et al
as 1:2016cv04004
Plaintiff:
Grace L Stovall
Defendant:
City of Chicago Department of Police, Peter Delgado, Officer Janusonis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harrington et al v. City of Hastings et al
as 4:2015cv03152
Defendant:
John Adams, All Other Employees of the City of Hastings, Josh Armon and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Harrington, Meltech, Inc. and Midwest Girls Club
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
