Cases 41 - 50 of 1,456
Isabel Vela v. Elizabeth Tucker
as 5:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Isabel Vela
Defendant:
Elizabeth Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
TUCKER v. YELLEN
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
ASHLEE MARIE TUCKER
Defendant:
JANET LOUISE YELLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TUCKER v. HUNNICUTT
as 1:2024cv00008
Defendant:
MARTHA ALLISON HUNNICUTT, M ALLISON HUNNICUTT and ALLISON HUNNICUTT
Plaintiff:
JASON DAVID TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tucker v. Chicago Park District
as 1:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
Carlos Tucker
Defendant:
Chicago Park District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv10147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Megginson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Michael Megginson
Defendant:
City of New York, Joshua Wigfall, Curtis Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rowena Simmons v. Baltimore City Police Department
as 24-1019
Plaintiff:
ROWENA SIMMONS, Individually, and on behalf of the Estate of Darius Gore, GARY TYSON and RAYMOND B. HINTON
Defendant:
BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER FELIX TORRES, OFFICER JOHNTA GRAY and others
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Sones de Mexico Ensemble et al
as 2:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Sones de Mexico Ensemble, The Chain Smokers, Stevie Wonder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
