Cases 41 - 50 of 557
Amar Gueye v. Android, et al
as 23-11324
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMAR GUEYE
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDROID, T-MOBILE USA, INC., AT&T and others
Scott v. United States Government et al
as 2:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
United States Government and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. United States Government et al
as 3:2023cv05333
Plaintiff:
Ruth Marie Anderson
Defendant:
United States Government, Xfinity, Broadband Cable Netwoeks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chisum v. United States Government et al
as 4:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Ramey Alaine Chisum
Defendant:
United States Government, Social Security Administration, Housing and Urban Development and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Zloza v. FBI et al
as 1:2023cv00464
Plaintiff:
Joseph Zloza
Defendant:
FBI, Chantix, United States Government and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Tran v. United States Government
as 3:2023cv05281
Plaintiff:
Tam Tran
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ryan Randall v. Bally's Casino, et al
as 23-15461
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN KENNETH RANDALL
Defendant / Appellee:
BALLY'S CASINO, CEO and Casino Security, VALERIE SENATRA, TROY TUKE, Bishop and others
Gueye v. Android et al
as 9:2023cv80463
Plaintiff:
Amar Gueye
Defendant:
Android, T-Mobile, AT&T and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Collier v. United States Government et al
as 2:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Linda Lee Collier
Defendant:
United States Government and Unknown Persons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maxwell v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Stephen Cortney Maxwell
Defendant:
Sheila Jackson Lee and United States Government and Congress
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
