Cases 51 - 60 of 1,759
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Proman et al v. Miller et al
as 4:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Doris Proman and Glenn J. Proman
Defendant:
Carol Bacon Miller, Carol Bacon Properties LLC, McNamara Adams, PC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. County of Lycoming et al
as 4:2023cv02161
Plaintiff:
Marvin Lee Turner
Defendant:
County of Lycoming, Lycoming County Prison, Brad A. Shoemaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Freeman v. Pleasant Plains, Arkansas
as 3:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Brad Freeman
Defendant:
Pleasant Plains, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
David Rocha et al v. City of Hemet et al
as 5:2023cv02607
Plaintiff:
David Rocha and Diana Rocha
Defendant:
City of Hemet, Hemet Police Department, Luke Tabor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ward v. Fisher et al
as 4:2023cv00554
Plaintiff:
Denver Ward
Defendant:
Laura Fisher, Carol L Swenson and Brad Grundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Carter v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2023cv02664
Plaintiff:
Joshua Levy Carter
Defendant:
State of Texas, Brad Randal, City of Garland Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Matthew Miller v. Dan Wilcot, et al
as 23-3623
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Matthew W. Miller
Defendant / Appellee:
Dan Wilcot, William K. Busch, Lynn Miller and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
