Cases 51 - 60 of 9,734
Saxena v. Corinth, et al
as 24-1212
Plaintiff:
GRANT MITCHELL SAXENA
Defendant:
MATTHEW CORINTH, ALASTAIR MCNIVEN, DANIELLE KAY KUNZE and others
Elliott v. Cowan et al
as 4:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Sarah Dawn Elliott
Defendant:
Matthew Cowan, Kearia Railey, Scott Childers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tucker v. Tahlequah, City of et al
as 6:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Barry Tucker
Defendant:
Tahlequah, City of and Matthew Frits
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ferrell v. Overton County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Brandy Danielle Ferrell
Defendant:
Overton County, Tennessee, Clyde Collier and Matthew Farmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v Wyoming Governor et al
as 1:2024cv00104
Defendant:
Wyoming Governor, Gillette Mayor, Former Gillette City Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce B Williams and The Hypatian Society
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Marchisotto v. Juan Sanchez, et al
as 24-1922
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
Matthew Jones v. Pigeon Forge, TN Police Department
as 24-5485
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
PIGEON FORGE, TN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Keener v. Cork et al
as 1:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Keener
Defendant:
Melanie Cork, Samuel Keirns, Ashley Skibinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LAMPLEY v. BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
TOMMY LAMPLEY
Defendant:
BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COMMISSIONER OF I.D.O.C., KYLE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
