Cases 51 - 60 of 466
Gibbons et al v. First National Bank and Trust Co
as 5:2022cv01008
Plaintiff:
John Gibbons and Realtimax Inc
Defendant:
First National Bank and Trust Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Tabit-EL v. Lavelle et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00665
Plaintiff:
Cheryl A. Tabit-EL and Sui Juris
Defendant:
Paul K. Lavelle, Bill Lewis, Duane Dewey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jenkins et al v. McHaney et al
as 3:2022cv02128
Plaintiff:
Scott Jenkins and Jenkins Displays, Co.
Defendant:
Michael McHaney, Kimberly Koester, Douglas Dugan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHAPMAN v. T-MOBILE et al
as 4:2022cv00113
Defendant:
TRUIST BANK, T-MOBILE, T-MOBILE FINANCIAL LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S RATIO LAFLARE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv06297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
