Cases 51 - 60 of 926
Roberson v. Connick et al
as 2:2023cv04022
Plaintiff:
Tamisha Bickham Roberson
Defendant:
Paul Connick, Samantha Webb, Michael Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2603
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robertson v. Lopez et al
as 5:2023cv04030
Plaintiff:
Ernie Robertson
Defendant:
Officer Lopez, City Of San Jose and Santa Clara County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1703
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robertson v. Biden
as 2:2023cv02473
Plaintiff:
Rachel Robertson
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jennifer Harmon v. Preferred Family Healthcare, Inc., et al
as 23-2691
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jennifer Harmon, individually and as surviving mother of N.J. and on behalf of the Class of Persons Designated by R.S. MO Section 537.080
Defendant / Appellee:
Preferred Family Healthcare, Inc., Second Judicial Circuit of the State of Missouri, Jeff Hall, individually, and in his individual capacity and others
Defendant:
Tracy Francis, individually, and in her individual capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Beasley v. Robertson
as 6:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Joshua Beasley
Defendant:
David Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
