Cases 51 - 60 of 81
Allen et al v. The City of Evergreen, Alabama et al
as 1:2013cv00106
Plaintiff:
Dan Allen, Bobby Watkins and Alberta Lee
Defendant:
The City of Evergreen, Alabama, Pete Wolff, III, Luther Upton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00856
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Guiton v. Dillard's Department Store et al
as 4:2012cv00703
Plaintiff:
Troy L. Guiton
Defendant:
Dillard's Department Store, Jonathan Crews and Steve Skipper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skipper v. City of Clarksdale, Mississippi et al
as 2:2012cv00160
Plaintiff:
Queston Skipper
Defendant:
City of Clarksdale, Mississippi , Milton Williams, Jr. , Carl Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen et al v. The City of Evergreen, Alabama et al
as 1:2012cv00496
Plaintiff:
Dan Allen , Bobby Watkins and Alberta Lee
Defendant:
The City of Evergreen, Alabama , Pete Wolff, III , Luther Upton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mary Thomas v. Early County, GA, et al
as 12-12910
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
EARLY COUNTY, GA, JIMMIE MURKERSON, TIMOTHY HARDRICK and others
SPRAGGINS v. WALTON COUNTY, et al
as 3:2012cv00012
Plaintiff:
WALTER C SPRAGGINS
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY, WALTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, PATRICK PILCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Elliot v. Staton et al
as 3:2011cv01536
Plaintiff:
Brett Elliot
Defendant:
Carol Hasler, John Does 1 - 10, Tim Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
