Cases 51 - 60 of 149
Marable v. United States Air Force et al
as 1:2018cv01690
Plaintiff:
Tyler Marable
Defendant:
United States Air Force, United States Army and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gene Scott, II v. United States Army Board of Co
as 18-16516
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GENE EDWARD SCOTT II
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY BOARD OF CORRECTIONS OF MILITARY RECORDS
William Starrett, Jr. v. Lockheed Martin Corporation, et al
as 18-10389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY STARRETT, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, TEXAS MILITARY DEPARTMENT, UNITED STATES ARMY CIVIL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS COMMAND and others
M.W., et al v. U.S. Department of the Army, et al
as 18-15242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
M.W., by and through her guardian ad litem, Hope W. and AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, MARK. T. ESPER, Secretary of the Army, in his official capacity, UNITED STATES ARMY FAMILY AND MORALE, WELFARE AND RECREATION PROGRAMS and others
Strange v. United States Army
as 2:2017cv02699
Plaintiff:
Levi Garcia Strange
Defendant:
United States Army
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. United States Army et al
as 6:2017cv00264
Defendant:
Captain FNU Dover, 1st Sgt. FNU Garcia and United States Army
Plaintiff:
Annette Denise Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. United States Army Reserve
as 2:2017cv01777
Plaintiff:
Vena Lynn Jones
Defendant:
United States Army Reserve
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
