Cases 51 - 60 of 3,327
Schochenmaier v. Gomez et al
as 5:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Ryan Schochenmaier
Defendant:
John Gomez, Jorge Esparza, Juan Galindo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Marks v. Kaiser et al
as 3:2024cv50118
Plaintiff:
Willie Roy Marks
Defendant:
Detective Brad Kaiser, Deputy Benjamin Valdivieso and Sergeant Lucas Wagner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glenn v. Kraszewski et al
as 2:2024cv10665
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Glenn, III
Defendant:
Aaron Kraszewski and Detroit, City of
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv01972
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MANAGER HILGEN, WILLIE WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Independent Horizon Seven, Inc. et al v. Smith
as 1:2024cv01787
Plaintiff:
Independent Horizon Seven, Inc., Walton Village Apartments and Walton Residential Services
Defendant:
Willie G. Smith
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
HUMANITARIAN v. LEARY et al
as 7:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
HUMANITARIAN, Larry L. Thomas Jr and LARRY L THOMAS JR
Defendant:
PETER D LEARY, STEPHEN LYNN, PETER KO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
