Cases 61 - 70 of 122
Ruby Dillon v. Harold LaFlamme et al
as 8:2015cv00339
Defendant:
Harold LaFlamme, Maureen Maganuma, Danise Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Ruby Dillon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruby Dillon v. Harold LaFlamme et al
as 2:2015cv01468
Defendant:
Harold LaFlamme, Robert Munoz, Mahathap Srikureja and others
Plaintiff:
Ruby Dillon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
John Bishop v. County of Macon, N.C.
as 14-2172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WILLIAM BISHOP and DONNA J. BISHOP
Plaintiff:
FRANK PERRY, ex rel.
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF MACON, North Carolina, MACON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ROBERT L. HOLLAND, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Sheriff of Macon County and others
Defendant:
MARSH USA, Inc.
C. G. W., Jr., et al v. Douglas County et al
as 3:2014cv00468
Plaintiff:
C. G. W., Jr. , C. G. W. , C. J. W. and others
Defendant:
Douglas County, Wisconsin , Thomas Dalbec and Fred Linder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Graham v. Montgomery County Circuit Court et al
as 1:2014cv00687
Plaintiff:
Gordon A. Graham
Defendant:
Montgomery County Circuit Court, Cheryl McCally, Daniel Wortman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J.J. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
as 1:2014cv00602
Plaintiff:
J. J. and C. J.
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2014cv80412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
