Cases 61 - 70 of 98
Edward Chevallier v. Deputy Sheriff Joel Hand
as 12-2983
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Edward Paul Chevallier
Defendant - Appellant:
Deputy Sheriff Joel Hand, Carroll County Deputy Sheriff, in his individual capacity
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff Billy Floyd, Carroll County Deputy Sheriff, in his individual capacity
CARROLL COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv01166
Plaintiff:
CARROLL COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR. and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Smith et al v. Carver et al
as 3:2012cv00385
Plaintiff:
Samuel Smith, Jr. and Prentiss Smith
Defendant:
Jerry Carver , Carroll County, Mississippi , Gordon Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Carroll County et al
as 1:2012cv01118
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gordon
Defendant:
Carroll County, Michael Lowe, Allison Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MILLER v. VOHNE LICHE KENNELS, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv00054
Defendant:
AMERICAN WORKING DOGS UNITED, INC., CARROLL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, CITY OF AURORA and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN D. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coffee v. Carroll County, Mississippi et al
as 4:2011cv00144
Plaintiff:
Albert Coffee
Defendant:
Carroll County, Mississippi and Jerry Carver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Carroll County, Mississippi et al
as 4:2011cv00145
Plaintiff:
Odessa Williams and Mary Williams
Defendant:
Carroll County, Mississippi and Jerry Carver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
