Cases 61 - 70 of 98
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv10026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
James Rogers, et al v. Sheriff Nelson O'Donnell, et al
as 12-6335
Plaintiff:
JAMES J. ROGERS
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARRY MURPHY and BRIAN HENSLEY
Defendant:
SHERIFF NELSON O'DONNELL, et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID W. SMITH and JENNIFER HALL SMITH
James Rogers, et al v. Sheriff Nelson O'Donnell, et al
as 12-6336
Plaintiff:
JAMES J. ROGERS
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
GARRY MURPHY and BRIAN HENSLEY
Defendant:
SHERIFF NELSON O'DONNELL, et al.
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
DAVID W. SMITH and JENNIFER HALL SMITH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
South Carolina, State of et al v. Ali
as 1:2012cv02629
Plaintiff:
South Carolina, State of, Aiken, County of, Burnettown, City of and others
Defendant:
Ajani Nasir Ali
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
South Carolina, State of et al v. Bakari
as 1:2012cv02630
Plaintiff:
South Carolina, State of, Aiken, County of, Burnettown, City of and others
Defendant:
Nailah Anah Bakari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Free v. Owens et al
as 1:2012cv01492
Plaintiff:
Oneal Free
Defendant:
Brian C Owens, David P Smith and Burnettown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Black Hawk County et al
as 6:2012cv02040
Plaintiff:
David L Smith
Defendant:
Black Hawk County , Tony Meyer , David Sapp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
