Cases 61 - 68 of 68
Johnny Spurlock v. Ashley County, et al
as 07-1917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Johnny Spurlock
Defendant - Appellee:
Ashley County, Arkansas, a subordinate political entity in the State of AR, James Robinson, Sheriff in his individual & official capacities, Homer McDougle, in his individual and official capacities and others
Defendant:
C. V. Christmas, in his individual & official capacities and Don White, in his individual and official capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Spurlock v. Dept of U.S. Army et al
as 2:2007cv02200
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Lester Spurlock
Defendant:
Dept of U.S. Army and John Simms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPURLOCK v. THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2007cv00332
Plaintiff:
JARMAN SPURLOCK
Defendant:
THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and CHRIS MOODY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Spurlock v. Voorhies et al
as 1:2007cv00043
Plaintiff:
Daniel Spurlock
Defendant:
Edwin Voorhies, Cynthia Davis and Matthew Stuntbeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marchiafava v. Barnett
as 02-30913
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark E. Marchiafava, Nicole Bean, Linda Glaviano and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael R. Barnett, Chief Criminal Deputy, Elmer Litchfield, Sheriff, Callender, Deputy Sheriff and others
Marchiafava, et al v. Barnett, et al
as 3:2000cv00111
Plaintiff:
Mark E Marchiafava, Nicole Bean, Linda Glaviano and others
Defendant:
Cheif Criminal Deput Michael R Barnett, Sheriff Elmer Litchfield, Deputy Sheriff Unknown Callender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
