Cases 71 - 80 of 358
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1169
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sparks v. Torres et al
as 6:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Michael Lynn Sparks
Defendant:
Major Claudia I. Torres, Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center and Department of the Army
Bahrampour v. Department of the Army
as 1:2022cv00710
Plaintiff:
Afshin Bahrampour
Defendant:
Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Sparks v. Torres et al
as 6:2022cv00290
Plaintiff:
Michael Lynn Sparks
Defendant:
Major Claudia I. Torres, Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center and Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5019
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Navy Seal 1, et al v. Secretary of the United States Department of Defen, et al
as 22-10645
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NAVY SEAL 1, United States Navy, NAVY SEAL 2, EOD OFFICER, United States Navy and others
Defendant / Appellant:
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Abbott v. Biden et al
as 6:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Greg Abbott and Mike Dunleavy
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Department of Defense, Lloyd Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv04002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Stephen Durr v. USA, et al
as 21-5296
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Stephen Durr
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America and Department of the Army
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
