Cases 71 - 80 of 111
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SCARBOROUGH v. NORRIS STREET LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al
as 2:2014cv02794
Plaintiff:
FRANCES SCARBOROUGH
Defendant:
NORRIS STREET LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and KENNETH BARITZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv03235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Muckle v. Mortgage Electronic Registrati, et al
as 13-1860
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL LAURENTON MUCKLE
Defendant - Appellee:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., PREMIERE ASSET SERVICES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv03250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Paul Muckle v. Mortgage Electronic Registrati, et al
as 12-2393
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL LAURENTON MUCKLE
Defendant - Appellee:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., PREMIERE ASSET SERVICES and others
Scarborough v. Naval Discharge Review Board et al
as 3:2012cv01205
Plaintiff:
Danny R. Scarborough
Defendant:
Naval Discharge Review Board, Board of Correction for Naval Records and United States Marine Corps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
