Cases 81 - 90 of 275
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. New York City Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv03636
Defendant:
New York City Ambulance Department and Fire Department and New York City Police Department
Plaintiff:
Veronica E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. The People of the New York City et al
as 1:2017cv03454
Defendant:
Every Race and Ethnic New York Everyday People Five Broghro Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Bronx, Staten Island, The People of the New York City and United States
Plaintiff:
Veronica E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. MTA Subway and Buses et al
as 1:2017cv03455
Defendant:
MTA Subway and Buses and N.Y.C. Transit
Plaintiff:
Veronica E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Kings County Hospital
as 1:2017cv03413
Defendant:
Kings County Hospital
Plaintiff:
Veronica E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Jesmon et al
as 1:2017cv03415
Defendant:
Jimmy Jesmon, B. Jim, Dr. Raymond Tan and others
Plaintiff:
Veronica E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv03414
Defendant:
Shirley C., HRA Employees, Mrs. Right and others
Plaintiff:
Veronica E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Deptula v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2017cv40055
Plaintiff:
Luke Deptula
Defendant:
City of Worcester , Jeffrey Carlson , James E Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
