Cases 81 - 90 of 1,536
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Jackson v. Duff et al
as 3:2023cv03095
Plaintiff:
Debra Mays Jackson
Defendant:
Tom Duff, Steven Cunningham, Bruce Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Goodrich v. City of Marion, Ohio et al.
as 3:2023cv02201
Plaintiff:
Donald Goodrich
Defendant:
City of Marion, Ohio, Austin Ray, Nicholas Kalb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rudd v. Mays
as 2:2023cv02721
Plaintiff:
Latanua K. Rudd
Defendant:
Samuel H. Mays, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Hopkins v. Speedie Recovery of South Florida et al
as 2:2023cv00958
Plaintiff:
Keith Hopkins
Defendant:
Speedie Recovery of South Florida and Adyleide Mai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Li et al v. CITY OF CHICAGO et al
as 1:2023cv15485
Plaintiff:
Dongping Li, Xiaozhen Mai, Patrick McGuire and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Mayor Brandon Johnson, Commissioner Matthew Beaudet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
