Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Burley v. Red Roof Inn et al
as 3:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Akeem Burley
Defendant:
Red Roof Inn, Fredrick Erwin Vaugn, Carmen Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Harris v. City of Grand Prairie
as 23-10846
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Akeem Harris
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Grand Prairie, they, them, they're, their, officer and Grand Prairie Police Department
Larry Bell, Sr. v. Cheryl Feuerstein, et al
as 23-35497
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY LYDELL BELL, Sr., and any other same like situated circumstances
Defendant / Appellee:
CHERYL J. FEUERSTEIN, Personal Representative of Estate, RAYLYNNA J. PETERSON, MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY and others
Harris v. City of Grand Prairie et al
as 3:2023cv00813
Plaintiff:
Akeem Harris
Defendant:
City of Grand Prairie and Grand Prairie Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jamerson v. Mackal
as 3:2023cv08070
Plaintiff:
Passion B Jamerson
Defendant:
Akeem Mackal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson et al v. Baltimore County et al
as 1:2023cv00561
Plaintiff:
Akeem Nelson and Danielle White
Defendant:
Baltimore County, MD, Officer A Sihota and Officer J Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bagley v. Guillen
as 22-20644
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Akeem Bagley
Defendant / Appellant:
Rudy Guillen
Akeem Gumbs v. Louis Penn, Jr.
as 22-3172
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AKEEM R. GUMBS
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUIS PENN, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
