Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv03213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Doolin v. Babcock et al
as 1:2021cv00771
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Doolin
Defendant:
Morgan Babcock, Joe Gilbert and Janet R. Gregor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
DOOLIN v. BROWN
as 2:2021cv00237
Defendant:
ANTHONY BROWN
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE DOOLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOOLIN v. STOCKTON et al
as 2:2021cv00213
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE DOOLIN
Defendant:
PUTNAM COUNTY HOSPITAL MEDICAL EMPLOYEE, PUTNAM COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT., PUTNAM COUNTY HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson, as Next Friend and Mother of A.W. a Minor v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv07783
Plaintiff:
Tiffiny Watson, as Next Friend and Mother of A.W. a Minor and Tiffiny Watson
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, Lisa Buckhalter (#20073), William Doolin (#1837) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley-Lomax v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv04595
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Joel Ortiz, Roberto Garduno and others
Plaintiff:
Jevarreo Kelley-Lomax
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Edwards et al
as 1:2020cv00103
Defendant:
Megan N. Pool, William M. Doolin, City of Chicago, a municipal corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Andre D Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Calvin v. Lyons, et al
as 5:2017cv00610
Plaintiff:
Vanessa G Lyons Calvin
Defendant:
Shirley Ann Lyons, John W Doolin, Vickie Leyja and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv00425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
