Cases 1 - 10 of 11,606
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Mencin v. City of Troy Police et al
as 4:2024cv00852
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mencin
Defendant:
City of Troy Police, Ron Sconce, Harold Horner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Gerran et al v. City of Ferguson et al
as 4:2024cv00843
Plaintiff:
Alisa Gerran, Lena Rogers, Kwan Scott and others
Defendant:
City of Ferguson, Marquis Jones and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones et al v. Ontario
as 5:2024cv01270
Plaintiff:
Kyle Jones and Crystal Jones
Defendant:
City of Ontario
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Archuleta
as 1:2024cv01685
Plaintiff:
Mr. Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Deputy Joseph Archuleta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Department of Defense et al
as 1:2024cv00990
Plaintiff:
Joshua Anthony Jones
Defendant:
Department of Defense, Office of the Secretary of Defense and Joint Staff, Nation Security Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
