Cases 1 - 10 of 122
Gesell v. Cottonwood, City of et al
as 3:2024cv08090
Plaintiff:
Stephen Gesell
Defendant:
Cottonwood, City of, Tim Elinski, Jesus Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Winkler v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Sonya Winkler
Defendant:
David John Harris, Franciscan Alliance, Inc., Donald John Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jones v. Wolcott Police Department
as 4:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Jerren Jones
Defendant:
Wolcott Police Department and Winkler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winkler, et al. v. Payne, et al.
as 3:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
Michelle Kirby Winkler, Yvonne Kay Peterson, Jeremy Carroll Akdison and others
Defendant:
Jeff P. Payne, Kathy M. Ackerman, Nikki Sickels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WINKLER v. ANDRZEJCZAK et al
as 1:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WINKLER
Defendant:
THOMAS ANDRZEJCZAK, TAD ACKER and BOROUGH OF CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joshua Garton v. W. Crouch, et al
as 23-6002
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA GARTON
Defendant / Appellee:
W. RAY CROUCH, DAVID RAUSCH, BRADLEY NEALON and others
Gutierrez v. Rodriguez et al
as 4:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Lea Shawnette Gutierrez
Defendant:
Elvia Rodriguez, Charles Wolf and Winkler County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023at00819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
