Cases 1 - 10 of 11
A.M. et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv10090
Plaintiff:
A.M., a minor,, Ahtziri Nava and A. M.
Petitioner:
Does 1-50
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department and Does 1-50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
E.M. et al v. New York City Department of Education
as 1:2022cv06874
Plaintiff:
E.M. and E.M. behalf of his child A.M., a minor
Defendant:
New York City Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Lemmons et al v. Hamilton County Government et al
as 1:2020cv00019
Plaintiff:
A.M. (a minor child) and Joleen Lemmons
Defendant:
Tyler McRae, Daniel Wilkey, Hamilton County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salem et al v. Pompeo et al
as 1:2019cv00363
Plaintiff:
Z.A. (a minor child), Sallam Yahia Moflah Zandani, Sharaf Mohsen and others
Defendant:
Larry Edward Andre, Devin Kennington, U.S. Department of State and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Mohamed Mohamed v. Irving Independent School Dist, et al
as 18-10444
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMED ELHASSAN MOHAMED, as Next Friend for A.M., a Minor
Defendant - Appellee:
IRVING INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, DANIEL CUMMINGS, In His Individual Capacity, CITY OF IRVING and others
Loushonda Myers v. Steve Bizzell
as 16-1083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUSHONDA MYERS, In Propria Persona Plaintiff, Private Attorney General, on behalf of Dameon Myers and Tyre Myers, In Propria Persona Plaintiffs
Plaintiff:
C.M., a minor child, A.M., a minor child, M.M., a minor child and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF STEVE BIZZELL, individually and in his official capacity as an employee with the Johnston County Sheriff's Office, CAPTAIN A.C. FISH, individually and in his official capacity as an employee with the Johnston County Sheriff's Office, DETECTIVE C.K. ALLEN, individually and in his official capacity as an employee with the Johnston County Sheriff's Office and others
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, KRISTA L. BENNET, individually and in her official capacity as Facilitator with the North Carolina State Bar, FERN GUNN SIMEON, individually and in her official capacity as Deputy Counsel with the North Carolina State Bar and others
COPE, et al v. KS State Board of Education, et al
as 14-3280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COPE, AKA Citizens for Objective Public Education, CARL REIMER, MARY ANGELA REIMER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KANSAS STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, JANET WAUGH, Member of the Kansas State Board of Education, in her official capacity only, STEVE ROBERTS, Member of the Kansas State Board of Education, in his official capacity and others
Loushonda Myers v. The State of North Carolina
as 13-2057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUSHONDA MYERS, C.M., a minor child, A.M., a minor child and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, KRISTA L. BENNET, individually and in her official capacity as Facilitator with the North Carolina State Bar, FERN GUNN SIMEON, individually and in her official capacity as Deputy Counsel with the North Carolina State Bar and others
Loushonda Myers v. The State of North Carolina
as 13-1963
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUSHONDA MYERS, C.M., a minor child, A.M., a minor child and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, KRISTA L. BENNET, individually and in her official capacity as Facilitator with the North Carolina State Bar, FERN GUNN SIMEON, individually and in her official capacity as Deputy Counsel with the North Carolina State Bar and others
A.M. v. Taconic Hills Central School
as 12-753
Plaintiff - Appellant:
A.M., a minor, by her Parent and Next Friend, Joanne McKay
Defendant - Appellee:
Taconic Hills Central School District, Dr. Mark Sposato, sued in his official capacity as Superintendent of Taconic Hills Central School District and Dr. Neil Howard, sued in his officeal capacity as Principal of Taconic Hills Middle School
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
