Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Matthew Jones v. Ohio State Highway Patrol, et al
as 24-3213
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
OHIO STATE HIGHWAY PATROL, CVG AIRPORT POLICE DEPARTMENT and CINCINNATI, OH HIGHWAY PATROL POST 31
Jones v. Ohio State Patrol et al
as 1:2023cv00794
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Ohio State Patrol, CVG Airport Police Department and Cincinnati Highway Patrol Post 31
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hutchins v. Arlington County Mental Behavioral Health Dept. et al
as 3:2022cv00788
Plaintiff:
Barry Hutchins
Defendant:
Arlington County Mental Behavioral Health Dept., Michael T. Baylous, Officer A. Sawyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Antonio Echevarria v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 2:2018cv09630
Defendant:
Los Angeles Airport Police Department, Los Angeles World Airports, LILLIAN C. GARCIA and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO ECHEVARRIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Logan v. Los Angeles Airport Police Department et al
as 2:2017cv02971
Defendant:
Officer Andrews, Officer Andrews, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Logan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Julius Levy v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2015cv08032
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Does, Los Angeles Airport Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Julius Levy
Nyhus v. City of Blaine et al
as 0:2013cv02878
Defendant:
City of Blaine , City of Bloomington , City of Brainerd and others
Plaintiff:
Natalie Ann Nyhus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harry Hampton v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 5:2012cv01098
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Does, Richard Hinkle and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Hampton
Harry Hampton v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2012cv06873
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Does, Richard Hinkle and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Hampton
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
