Cases 1 - 10 of 279
Liu v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv02413
Plaintiff:
Xiang Liu
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Attorney General Merrick Garland and Lynuel Dennis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00955
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LOCKE v. MAYORKAS et al
as 2:2024cv06496
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE LOCKE
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Brewer v. Burns et al
as 2:2024cv00149
Defendant:
William Burns, Stephan Breyer, Andrew Weissmann and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Shelton Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
XELUP v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE et al
as 1:2024cv01241
Plaintiff:
TUSHKHUMOC XELUP
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, GINA RAIMONDO, UNITED STATES CENSUS BUREAU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
VERGARA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv05555
Defendant:
REGINA INEZ PEOPLES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS EDUARDO VERGARA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
