Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00198
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Johnson et al
as 2:2020cv02283
Plaintiff:
Lisa Jane Graham
Defendant:
Kolby Klaurens, Deana Johnson, Ashley Nichole (Mann) Klaurens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dale v. RBR Enterprise, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00067
Plaintiff:
Ashley Nichole Dale
Defendant:
RBR Enterprise, LLC and Crenlo Cab Products, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sexton v. Hamilton County Goverment et al (PLR2)
as 1:2018cv00017
Defendant:
Hamilton County Goverment , Spencer Daniels , Blake Kilpatrick and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Nichole Sexton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bender v. Binkley et al
as 3:2017cv00994
Plaintiff:
Albert M. Bender
Defendant:
Joe P. Binkley, Jr. and Mary Ashley Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillip v. Dozier et al
as 2:2016cv02072
Plaintiff:
Charles Phillip
Defendant:
Steve Dozier , Kyle Anderson, Bill Haslam and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sons of Hell Motorcycle Club et al v. Arizona Department of Public Safety et al
as 3:2013cv08192
Plaintiff:
Sons of Hell Motorcycle Club , Harry Dayle Hamilton , Janice Renee Hamilton and others
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Public Safety, Robert Halliday, Unknown Halliday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00187
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
