Cases 1 - 10 of 247
Byers v. May et al
as 3:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Kevin Byers
Defendant:
Brendan May, John Does and Augusta, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Reaves et al v. Kyler et al
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves, Tiesha Danielle Evans and Dmitri A. Reaves
Defendant:
David Levert Kyler, Officer Sutton, County of Richmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRYSON v. PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
IVAN BRYSON
Defendant:
PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC, CRYSTAL PAGE, MIKE WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wihly Harpo-Brown v. Naman Augusta, LLC
as 24-11070
Plaintiff:
WIHLY HARPO-BROWN
Defendant:
NAMAN AUGUSTA, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PASCHAL v. AUGUSTA STATE MEDICAL PRISON
as 4:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
WARREN PASCHAL, JR
Defendant:
AUGUSTA STATE MEDICAL PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez v. Wilkins et al
as 5:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
William Gonzalez
Defendant:
Sandra Wilkins and Augusta County Animal Control
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Coaty v. Gospel Rescue Mission
as 1:2024cv00011
Defendant:
Gospel Rescue Mission and Rescue Mission
Plaintiff:
Augusta Coaty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilhy Harpo-Brown v. Director, Richmond County Board of Elections, et al
as 24-10078
Plaintiff:
WILHY HARPO-BROWN
Defendant:
DIRECTOR, RICHMOND COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, RICHMOND COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY COMMISSION
Quizel Welsh v. United States, et al
as 24-1003
Plaintiff:
Quizel Welsh, "I Am That I Am"
Defendant:
United States of America, Ghan & Cooper Commercial Properties, Kathleen Caldarrera, Partner and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
