Cases 1 - 10 of 11
ECHO LAKE INVESTMENTS, LLC et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
ECHO LAKE INVESTMENTS, LLC and SYED NURUZZAMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JACQUELINE C. ROMERO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Betterson v. The Town of Cutler Bay et al
as 1:2023cv24525
Plaintiff:
Melissa Antoinette Betterson
Defendant:
The Town of Cutler Bay, Miami Dade County, Stephanie V Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROOKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv02222
Plaintiff:
ANDRE R. BROOKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JACQUELINE C. ROMERO and STEVEN M. DETTELBACH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
B. et al v. Romero et al
as 1:2022cv11851
Plaintiff:
F. B. and G. G.
Defendant:
Melvis C. Romero, Massachusetts Department of Corrections, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
B. et al v. Romero et al
as 1:2022cv11849
Plaintiff:
F. B., G. G. and Kristie Ladouceur
Defendant:
Melvis C. Romero, Department of Corrections of Massachusetts, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv10698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Spataru v. Miami- Dade Police Department (MDPD) et al
as 1:2020cv23727
Defendant:
Juan Perez, Carlos Gimenez, John Swat 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Valentin Spataru
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv09275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Boyd v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2012cv00042
Plaintiff:
Don Boyd
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Medical College of Georgia Police Bureau and C. Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
