Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Chase v. City of Excelsior Springs, Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv00903
Plaintiff:
Dianna Chase
Defendant:
City of Excelsior Springs, Missouri, Gregory Dull, Bret Rider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Ford Jr v. The City of Bryan, Texas
as 4:2023cv01459
Plaintiff:
Melvin Ford Jr and Melvin Daniel Ford, Jr
Defendant:
The City of Bryan, Texas, St. Joseph Hospital, Lee Saunder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Younker v. City of Wood River, Illinois et al
as 3:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
Bobbi Jo Younker
Defendant:
City of Wood River, Illinois, Brad Wells and Chris Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2020cv05222
Plaintiff:
David Rice, Chris Johnson, Seth Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rice et al v. City of Roy et al
as 3:2020cv05223
Defendant:
City of Roy, Chris Johnson and Darwin Armitage
Plaintiff:
Seth Donahue, David Rice and Elizabeth Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSS v. JACKSON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD et al
as 5:2019cv00244
Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, LARRY MOORE, TONY PUMPHREY and others
Plaintiff:
ELTON R RUSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Leonard v. City of Nelsonville, Ohio et al
as 2:2018cv01126
Defendant:
City of Nelsonville, Ohio, Chris Johnson and Scott Dawley
Plaintiff:
Ronald D Leonard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
McMillen v. Windham et al
as 3:2016cv00558
Plaintiff:
Michelle McMillen
Defendant:
Reginald Windham, Victor Holt, Bob Hayter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
