Cases 1 - 10 of 344
Combs v. Petrucci et al
as 3:2024cv01521
Defendant:
County of Lackawanna/City of Scranton, James Petrucci, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Combs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01197
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LaRose v. Combs et al
as 3:2024cv02242
Defendant:
Sean Combs, Ciroc, Combs Enterprises and others
Plaintiff:
Pshatoia LaRose
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Antwon French v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Justice, LFUCG, et al
as 24-5728
Defendant:
BRIAN GOETTL, BOYD MINNIFIELD, LOU ANNA RED CORN and others
Plaintiff:
ANTWON FRANCOIS FRENCH, A.I.R , minor child of Antwon French
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Lusters S Curl et al
as 2:2024cv06566
Defendant:
Lusters Products Inc., Lusters S Curl, Anthony Stephen Fauci and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Combs v. County of Lane et al
as 6:2024cv01016
Defendant:
County of Lane and Elizabeth Rambo
Plaintiff:
Talitha Lacey Combs and Talitha Lacey Randall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hazen v. Lear et al
as 3:2024cv00584
Defendant:
Abdulrahma Toubaili, Robert A. Hardwick, Blake Gruny and others
Plaintiff:
Mason R. Hazen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00416
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
