Cases 1 - 10 of 652
VERGARA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv05555
Defendant:
REGINA INEZ PEOPLES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS EDUARDO VERGARA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Paul Clement Johnsen et al
as 2:2024cv02456
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members and James Lee
Defendant:
PAUL CLEMENT JOHNSEN, TRUSTEE, WENDY MICHELLE JOHNSEN, TRUSTEE and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Konecny v. The Big M Casino, et al
as 24-1090
Plaintiff:
J. ALAN KONECNY, AKA Alan J. Konecny
Defendant:
THE BIG M CASINO, GEORGE FREELAND, DANA GOODELL and others
Caulder v. Carolina Beach Police Department et al
as 7:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Christopher Caulder
Defendant:
Carolina Beach Police Department, Brandon Smith, Crofton Stephenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CLEMENT v. GARLAND
as 1:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA CLEMENT and HH EMPRESS QUEEN CHRISTINA LOCS IS OUR ARTIFACT OF FAITH
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
CLEMENT v. WASHINGTON POST
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
AUDREY CLEMENT
Defendant:
WASHINGTON POST
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00141
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
