Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Erich Smith, et al v. President United States of America, et al
as 24-3007
Plaintiff:
FRANK E. GARWOOD, JR., MARIBEL LORENZO, DR. DANIEL DONOFRIO and others
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, In his official capacity and any successor to the office of the president and others
Higgins v. Issitt et al
as 2:2024cv02532
Defendant:
Manuel O Delgado, Jr., Alex Michael Azar, Charles Paul Rettig and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Rock Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01167
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Acosta v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv01249
Plaintiff:
Samuel R. Acosta and Samuel R Acosta
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-13212
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
