Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Harbor Breeze AMI, LLC et al v. City of Holmes Beach, Florida et al
as 8:2022cv01682
Plaintiff:
Harbor Breeze AMI, LLC, James Daniel Clark and Justin Daniel Clark
Defendant:
City of Holmes Beach, Florida and William L. Tokajer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. City of Henderson, Texas et al
as 6:2020cv00468
Defendant:
City of Henderson, Texas, Trudy McGill and Rusk County, Texas
Plaintiff:
Jesse Daniel Clark, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv11065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. California Department of Forestry and Fire Portection et al
as 3:2015cv04808
Plaintiff:
Daniel Clark
Defendant:
California Department of Forestry and Fire Portection , Mike Mathiesen , Jim Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Clark
as 1:2014cv03399
Plaintiff:
Delise Ross
Defendant:
Daniel Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMON et al v. CLARK et al
as 2:2014cv00559
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD SIMON and STEPHANIE SIMON
Defendant:
DANIEL CLARK , RALPH VARRATO , GILPIN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Youance v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv03193
Plaintiff:
Feginse Youance
Defendant:
The City of New York, Daniel Clark, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MacDonald, et al v. Town of Windham, NH, et al
as 08-1019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MACDONALD and MARISOL MACDONALD
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF WINDHAM, NEW HAMPSHIRE, DANIEL CLARK and RANDY GUILBAULT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
