Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Collins v. Southeast Arkansas Community Action Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Ronald B Collins
Defendant:
Southeast Arkansas Community Action Corporation, Entergy Assistance Program and Does Supervisor at Warren Office; Employees at McGehee office; Head Staff at Desha County office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Middleton v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
as 1:2019cv07604
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Plaintiff:
Desha Middleton
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109
Martin
as 1:2016at00749
Plaintiff:
Lanell Martin
Defendant:
D. Desha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARRIS v. NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON et al
as 3:2011cv07266
Plaintiff:
GOLDA HARRIS
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KEVIN JESPERSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Burks v. Carter et al
as 5:2010cv00358
Plaintiff:
Michael Burks
Defendant:
Steve Carter , Ben Hines , Diane Baldwin and others
Cross_claimant:
Diane Baldwin , McGehee-Desha County Hospital and Oboma Asemota
Cross_defendant:
Oboma Asemota , Steve Carter , Ben Hines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman v. McElroy et al
as 5:2010cv00297
Plaintiff:
Onie Norman
Defendant:
Mark McElroy, Desha County Quorum Court, Charles Denver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Crift v. Williams et al
as 5:2009cv00326
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Crift, Jr and Lawrence Crift, Jr
Defendant:
Jason Williams, Joey Moore, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Norman et al v. McElroy et al
as 5:2008cv00258
Plaintiff:
Onie Norman and Flora Simons
Defendant:
Mark McElroy, Desha County Quorum Court, Charles Denver and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
