Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Harris v. Rare Hospitalilty International, Inc.
as 6:2023cv03189
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Harris
Defendant:
Rare Hospitalilty International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Biton v. Turco et al
as 1:2019cv11960
Plaintiff:
Marcelle Crystal Biton and Saphyre Redford
Defendant:
James/Jeffrey Hubbard, Homeland Security, Weitz & Luxenburg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris et al v. Cleveland City Schools (PLR1)
as 1:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Harris and Michael Harris
Defendant:
Cleveland City Schools
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS KING et al v. CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT OF COLUMBUS GEORGIA et al
as 4:2016cv00372
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH HARRIS KING and KEIONA WRIGHT
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT OF COLUMBUS GEORGIA , MICHAEL CIELINSKI and TERRI EZELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Biton v. Lippert
as 13-2302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Crystal Biton
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael Lippert, Charles Harris and Elizabeth Harris
Biton v. Clinton
as 13-1210
Plaintiff:
Moore Redford
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Crystal Biton and Danielle Biton
Defendant - Appellee:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, United States of America, Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York and others
Biton v. Lippert et al
as 1:2012cv09373
Plaintiff:
Crystal Biton
Defendant:
Michael Lippert, Charles Harris and Elizabeth Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity: Notice of Removal
Biton et al v. Clinton et al
as 1:2011cv06160
Plaintiff:
Charlene Michelle Biton, Crystal Biton, Moore Redford and others
Defendant:
Hillary Clinton, United States Of America, Michael Cardozo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
