Cases 1 - 10 of 154
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
YOUNG et al v. FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD OF GOVERNORS et al
as 2:2024cv05422
Plaintiff:
ZADOK ISRAEL, PAUL SAVAGE and JOHNNY YOUNG
Defendant:
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF PHILADELPHIA, U.S. TREASURY and FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD OF GOVERNORS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06788
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2ra Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2807
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv23279
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Doe et al v. Atlanta Fire Department et al
as 1:2024cv03557
Plaintiff:
Salinas Acosta Weaver, Salinas Falun Smith, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Defendant:
Atlanta Public School System, Atlanta Fire Department and Atlanta Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01314
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01790
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Equal Rights Under the Law
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
