Cases 1 - 10 of 12
D.C. v. City of Kendallville Indiana et al
as 1:2022cv00246
Plaintiff:
D. C.
Defendant:
CITY OF KENDALLVILLE, INDIANA, OFFICER MATT GILLISON, OFFICER ROBERT KLINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PePe s, Inc. v. City of Rancho Cucamonga et al
as 5:2020cv02506
Defendant:
Dennis Michael, County of San Bernardino, Lynne Kennedy and others
Plaintiff:
PePe s, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Peps Towing and PePe s, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Pepes Towing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brazil v. Gillison et al
as 1:2020cv00400
Plaintiff:
Dr. Maria J. Brazil
Defendant:
Corporal Matthew Gillison, Officer Kevin Pegan, Kendallville Police Department and others
Not Classified By Court:
Dan Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gadlin v. Wilkie et al
as 5:2020cv05116
Defendant:
Robert Wilkie and Regina Gillison
Plaintiff:
Tashia S Gadlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
FISHER v. CASTLEBERRY et al
as 2:2019cv02659
Defendant:
EVERETT GILLISON, THEODORE JOHNSON, AUDREY DONALD and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE FISHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3963
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
FUNARO et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv01520
Plaintiff:
FRANK FUNARO
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN MASSI, WILLIAM LA TORRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
