Cases 1 - 10 of 1,038
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
East v. Alabama State Board of Pharmacy et al
as 2:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Billy Flint East
Defendant:
Alabama State Board of Pharmacy, Donna Conyers Yeatman, James S Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Subasic v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Slobodan Subasic
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission, Oregon Department of Administrative Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Town of East Hampton Housing Authority et al
as 2:2024cv03426
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Town of East Hampton Housing Authority, Seymour Schutz LLC and Catherine Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Loney v. Dennis et al
as 3:2024cv02832
Plaintiff:
Carrie R. Loney
Defendant:
Anthony Dennis, Hampton Gardner, Medgar Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
